What I'm working ON

I am currently working an explosive series about the Michael Jackson jury during his 2005 criminal trial. The series will be entitled "Dumb Juror Syndrome: Inside the Michael Jackson Jury." It will be an explosive, powerful, and dynamic series that will take a long, hard look into the most powerful players in the trial of the century.

The series will expose many things including:

- how the jury did not understand, or did not want to understand the definition of "reasonable doubt"

- how the jury ignored and did not look at crucial prosecution evidence that pointed to Michael Jackson's guilt

- how the jury foreman intimated juror Katarina Carls by misleading her on the facts of the law, reasonable doubt, and made racist comments towards her all in hope that she would change her vote from guilty to not guilty

- I will expose the little known fact that a member of the jury told Court TV's Diane Dimond the day after the verdict that he thinks Michael Jackson is a child molestor

- how the jury had the intention of profiting off their position as jurors and thought that a "not guilty" verdict would put them in the best position to do so

- how the jury engaged in juror misconduct in the jury room

- how the jury ignored a specific piece of material that was entered into evidence by the prosecution

- how the jury ignored specific witnesses that favored the prosecution and pointed to Michael Jackson's guilt

- I will expose how the jurors made inconsistent statements during their press conference and in interviews they gave to the media

- the real reason why jurors Ellie Cook and Raymond Hultman told the media that their was nothing wrong in the jury room the day after the verdict, but then months later alleged countless acts of misconduct and said that they were intimidated into their not guilty verdict in favor of book and movie deals

- I will expose that at least 3 members of the Michael Jackson jury were die hard fans of his

- I will expose and lay out the facts and truth about the slanderous and derogatory statements Tom Mesereau made to the jury about the accuser and his family... statements which have proven to be untrue. For example, Mesereau alleged to the jury that the family was just in this for money and they were going to file a civil suit immediately following the verdict. Almost 3 years have passed and this statement has been proven untrue

- I will expose how one juror committed an act of juror misconduct during the trial by going and speaking to a witness and friend after her testimony as reported in investigative journalist Diane Dimond's book on the Michael Jackson case "Be Careful Who You Love," which you can purchase at Amazon.com or your local bookseller

- I will expose how law enforcement and authorites have failed in their job to protect the integrity of criminal trials by not prosecuting members of this jury for the rampid juror misconduct that occured during and after the trial

- I will expose how the judge showed bias and favor for the defense by not putting Michael Jackson in jail the day of pajama day

- I will expose how pajama day may have been a defense strategy to divert the jury's attention away from the accuser and his testimony

- I will look into the effect this verdict had on other victims of child abuse in America

- I will expose how the defense team played fast and loose with ethics while defending Michael Jackson

- I will look into the very serious question about how we choose juries in America

- I will expose how this jury did not understand the law and did not follow the jury instructions given to them by the judge

- I will expose Michael Jackson's long history of child abuse allegations agianst him

- I will explain why and how the accuser and his family could succeed in a civil suit agianst Michael Jackson if they so choose to bring one

- I will lay out a jury action plan for prosecutors and District Attornies all across the country to make sure a grave injustice like this does not happen agian

- how Tom Mesereau mislead the jury by making them believe the prosecution had to prove the allegations beyond all doubt when in reality the standard is that they have to prove them to a moral and reasonable certanity

- the unfotunate reality that Michael Jackson is more likely than not to never face a courtroom again for allegations of child abuse because no prosecutor would ever want to take the case and go after a world wide mega music superstar like Michael Jackson who has beat the rapp so many times before

Its going to be powerful. This series will provide comprehensive insight and trigger your mind to think about one of the greatest injustices to ever go down in an American courtroom. Its a Larry Harriet exclusive. And its all going to be right here. Stay tuned!